Sunday, August 18, 2019
Jack The Ripper Essay -- Papers
 Jack The Ripper          1. From looking at the newspaper article on source A, I can determine     the following information regarding the murder of Polly Nichols.     Firstly, I can ascertain that it was the second of the Whitechapel     murders. I can draw this conclusion from the first few words 'the two     murders which have so startled London'. The second point we can learn     from this article is that the killer had no apparent motive for the     killings, supposedly because money wasn't missing from his victims;     'no adequate motive in the shape of plunder can be traced'. Also, the     article tells us that the victims have been 'the poorest of the poor'       Even though these pieces of information are product of the media, they     appear to be true, as there would be no need for the newspaper to     sensationalise such facts. The source also suggests the killer is a     'demented being', due to the 'extraordinary violence' exhibited in     each of his murders. Finally, the source makes reference to the     'excess of effort' used by the killer       2. The report of Dr. Frederick Blackwell on the body of Elizabeth     Stride supports the coroner's report on source B when it states that     'in the neck, there was a long incision which commenced on the left     side, two and a half inches below the jaw, cutting the windpipe     completely in two'. This account supports source B which states;     'there are no meaningless cuts' and that 'the injuries have been made     by someone with considerable anatomical skill' obviously because the     killer knew where to reach the windpipe. The extract also supports     source A where it talks about the 'extraordinary violence'. However,     source C contradicts source A when ...              ... that a     disgruntled customer of one of the local Jewish craftsmen's shops may     have just written this graffiti to express his anger. The only thing     linking this graffiti to the Eddowes murder was a tiny piece of     Eddowes's apron found nearby. Source A mentions the victims being 'the     poorest of the poor'. This is important, as maybe the police weren't     worried as much about the poor people. Also this suggests that the     killings may have been in hard to reach places for the police. Source     B mentions the 'anatomical skill and knowledge' required to carry out     such murders. Maybe such a man could also have enough knowledge to be     able to out wit the police. Source F, the leaflet is another reminder     of the police effort to stop the Ripper getting away, but it could     also have let the Ripper know of the police involvement too much.                      Jack The Ripper Essay -- Papers   Jack The Ripper          1. From looking at the newspaper article on source A, I can determine     the following information regarding the murder of Polly Nichols.     Firstly, I can ascertain that it was the second of the Whitechapel     murders. I can draw this conclusion from the first few words 'the two     murders which have so startled London'. The second point we can learn     from this article is that the killer had no apparent motive for the     killings, supposedly because money wasn't missing from his victims;     'no adequate motive in the shape of plunder can be traced'. Also, the     article tells us that the victims have been 'the poorest of the poor'       Even though these pieces of information are product of the media, they     appear to be true, as there would be no need for the newspaper to     sensationalise such facts. The source also suggests the killer is a     'demented being', due to the 'extraordinary violence' exhibited in     each of his murders. Finally, the source makes reference to the     'excess of effort' used by the killer       2. The report of Dr. Frederick Blackwell on the body of Elizabeth     Stride supports the coroner's report on source B when it states that     'in the neck, there was a long incision which commenced on the left     side, two and a half inches below the jaw, cutting the windpipe     completely in two'. This account supports source B which states;     'there are no meaningless cuts' and that 'the injuries have been made     by someone with considerable anatomical skill' obviously because the     killer knew where to reach the windpipe. The extract also supports     source A where it talks about the 'extraordinary violence'. However,     source C contradicts source A when ...              ... that a     disgruntled customer of one of the local Jewish craftsmen's shops may     have just written this graffiti to express his anger. The only thing     linking this graffiti to the Eddowes murder was a tiny piece of     Eddowes's apron found nearby. Source A mentions the victims being 'the     poorest of the poor'. This is important, as maybe the police weren't     worried as much about the poor people. Also this suggests that the     killings may have been in hard to reach places for the police. Source     B mentions the 'anatomical skill and knowledge' required to carry out     such murders. Maybe such a man could also have enough knowledge to be     able to out wit the police. Source F, the leaflet is another reminder     of the police effort to stop the Ripper getting away, but it could     also have let the Ripper know of the police involvement too much.                        
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.